Jump to content

Platinum level Jagex recognized fansite

Toggle shoutbox ColorWars ShoutBox

Need a Shield of Arrav / Heroes Quest Partner? Click here!
Robbie07731 : (Oct 24,2014 13:05) Back to sleep i go <.<
Robbie07731 : (Oct 24,2014 12:49) urrr, who woke me >.>
Misty Fuzzy : (Oct 24,2014 11:59) no no no no please no :(
James : (Oct 24,2014 11:41) Oh God.. the new horror quest will have jumpscares..
Misty Fuzzy : (Oct 24,2014 10:06) Looking forward to the pest control event tonight :D
Supremacy : (Oct 23,2014 20:50) I enjoyed the 1m profit from that event. :D
senug : (Oct 23,2014 18:49) Thanks for the Corp event, even though I turned up about half an hour late and got most of the drops, it was fun and with a few people, easily killed :)
senug : (Oct 23,2014 16:10) Corp hmmm??? I might not come to that, or I may be late for it. :D
Sliver : (Oct 23,2014 16:02) RuneHQ Corporeal Beast event starts in 58m! World: 67 FC: Bertie
Alfawarlord : (Oct 23,2014 13:28) yes they are 2 different accounts with separate stats, though you use the same login details
RoseOfTheRaven : (Oct 23,2014 12:52) Are characters in old school runescape seperate from the current runescape?
RoseOfTheRaven : (Oct 23,2014 12:50) I did, was only replying to what he said
Bazzy : (Oct 23,2014 12:50) I think the addition showing them what topic, is making people think they can use the shoutbox to find help with partner quests.
Bazzy : (Oct 23,2014 12:49) Guys please, The shoutbox is NOT for partner requests. Please use the topic and await contact on there.
RoseOfTheRaven : (Oct 23,2014 12:37) drink i can do heroes with you when you get to it
Jigerkiller : (Oct 23,2014 12:28) NIck i just mesaged you
Nick : (Oct 23,2014 12:24) I have went ahead and created a new account under the alias SOAhelp1 and am currently training on cows to successfully join a gang to defeat the level 21 opponent. If this does not take too long, I will be sure to regularly make these accounts (Free of charge) if the certificates do not deplenish quickly.
drinksimp : (Oct 23,2014 12:19) Add me if you need a black arm partner. Drink Simp
senug : (Oct 23,2014 12:12) For partner requests, please click the link above the shoutbox. There is no need with spamming out the shoutbox with partner requests. If you posted on the topic already, then be patient. :)
Jigerkiller : (Oct 23,2014 11:41) right

Photo

voting reform


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
27 replies to this topic

#1 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:59 AM

so i was sitting outside thinking and came up with this idea

what if instead of voting directly for a person we were to present a series of questions and the system would put your vote with the person(s) who most fit your answers. this would somewhat streamline the voting process and force an informed decision rather than the system we have now where if you dont know or (like most people in the u.s.) haven't bothered to do the research you simply put in a random name from the ballot.

discuss, excited to see what ppl have to say.


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#2 Paintball

Paintball

    Eppur si muove

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,020 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 01:19 AM

Because I could run for office and just list what a majority of people agree with and win. Doesn't mean I have to vote that way, but it would be an incredibly easy way to win. We vote for people not only because their stance on issues is similar to ours, but also because we can connect with them.

We have debates so people can make an informed decision, and to see how people carry themselves. In politics it's more important to get other people to agree with you and make compromises rather than a strict stance on issues.

Hope this made sense, curse midnight writing XD
Posted Image
Signature by Brandon

#3 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 04:42 AM

it made sense and i see what you mean but there has to be a better way than the current. the problem is is that the majority of the u.s. simply doesn't give a flying ##### about making an informed decision hell half the time when you try to inform them they simply say something along the lines of " oh thats right quote fox news idc what you say i like this person and your an idiot for disagreeing" perhaps you should be required to pass some sort of intelligence test to receive a voters registration card. why should ppl who dont care to make an informed decision about such important issues be given any sort of say in such matters?

Edited by kilvehk, 26 September 2012 - 04:43 AM.


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#4 Varunky

Varunky

    Lurker

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,733 posts
Click to view battle stats

User's Awards

             

Posted 26 September 2012 - 08:13 AM

This seems unnecessarily hard. While I don't like how sometimes it's a popularity contest or just one side getting their voters to actually come out more than the others. Plus, there's enough ballot recounting with the current system where you just select your candidate, just think how hard it would be to recount the votes doing it this way.

Varunky.pngVarunky.png
Proud owner of 10year Vet. cape.
Fan of loadingreadyrun ••••>
Saved by grace through faith - Eph 2:8-10

 

 


#5 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 10:04 AM

Actually, we don't directly vote for the president. Our votes our evaluated by the electoral college, and they make the vote with OR WITHOUT our influence.

billiam.png


#6 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 11:21 AM

ik will and that already needs to be done away with look at what got bush elected


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#7 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 11:47 AM

Then the problem that you're noting is not that the voting system is flawed, but that the average American is F(&^*** retarded (true fact)

billiam.png


#8 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:04 PM

obviously and that presents a problem when trying to make a system that works in spite of their idiocy i was trying to avoid being to harsh about it will but thats exactly the problem

Edited by kilvehk, 26 September 2012 - 12:07 PM.


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#9 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 12:31 PM

obviously and that presents a problem when trying to make a system that works in spite of their idiocy i was trying to avoid being to harsh about it will but thats exactly the problem

Our current system *is* one that works in spite of their idiocy. The members of the electoral college can always "veto" the general population's decision should it prove to be misled

billiam.png


#10 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 01:09 PM

but the collage is full of idiots as well how can the stupid effectively make decisions for both the intelligent and the stupid. those of higher intelligence are the ones capable of effective leadership

Edited by kilvehk, 26 September 2012 - 01:11 PM.


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#11 Claudia

Claudia

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 556 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 02:32 PM

Um, they (the electoral college) make decisions based on what the people say.

What do you suggest, then, in place of the electoral college? Your original idea is really impractical, so if you think the electoral college sucks then i'd like to hear your improved idea.

Edited by Claudia, 26 September 2012 - 02:33 PM.

Sweetheart.png


#12 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 03:07 PM

but the collage is full of idiots as well how can the stupid effectively make decisions for both the intelligent and the stupid. those of higher intelligence are the ones capable of effective leadership


The Electoral College certainly isn't full of idiots. It consists of seasoned politicians, who are obviously much better informed than the average American.

Um, they (the electoral college) make decisions based on what the people say.

What do you suggest, then, in place of the electoral college? Your original idea is really impractical, so if you think the electoral college sucks then i'd like to hear your improved idea.


The electoral college has voted against the majority once and against the plurality thrice, so it's not completely based on what people say

billiam.png


#13 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 03:23 PM

yeah and look at what we got because of it fracking bush...... and no not all of them are seasoned politicians i remember one case in particular where the son of a governor donated a large sum of money to a candidate and got into the electoral collage immediately after. and on top of that just because they are seasoned politicians doesn't mean they aren't idiots it only means that idiots voted them into an office. by that i mean not that they were elected to the electorial collage but that in order to be a "seasoned politician" one must first be elected into an office to be involved in politics enough to become seasoned


cluadia i dont believe it was impractical it was a spur of the moment idea and definitely could use a bit more thought behind it but the premise of it is still a valid one

Edited by kilvehk, 26 September 2012 - 03:27 PM.


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#14 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 05:08 PM

yeah and look at what we got because of it fracking bush...... and no not all of them are seasoned politicians i remember one case in particular where the son of a governor donated a large sum of money to a candidate and got into the electoral collage immediately after. and on top of that just because they are seasoned politicians doesn't mean they aren't idiots it only means that idiots voted them into an office. by that i mean not that they were elected to the electorial collage but that in order to be a "seasoned politician" one must first be elected into an office to be involved in politics enough to become seasoned


cluadia i dont believe it was impractical it was a spur of the moment idea and definitely could use a bit more thought behind it but the premise of it is still a valid one


I don't see why your hatred of Bush has anything to do with this. You have no 'premise' at all; all you say is that you want there to be a better voting system. I've already proven how our voting system does the best it can without having to actually reeducate our population. Sure, the system is flawed, but saying "the average American should not be retarded" is not a better plan.

About the governor's son example, that is just one out of the 500+ electoral votes and an outlier; however, I do agree that money plays too much of a role in modern politics but nevertheless feel that a governor's son would have a vast amount of political knowledge

billiam.png


#15 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 05:34 PM

I don't see why your hatred of Bush has anything to do with this. You have no 'premise' at all; all you say is that you want there to be a better voting system. I've already proven how our voting system does the best it can without having to actually reeducate our population. Sure, the system is flawed, but saying "the average American should not be retarded" is not a better plan.

About the governor's son example, that is just one out of the 500+ electoral votes and an outlier; however, I do agree that money plays too much of a role in modern politics but nevertheless feel that a governor's son would have a vast amount of political knowledge


im not saying my original idea was a good one it was barely thought out and not even half backed but impractical it was not flawed yes but not impractical think of ways these ideas could possibly be improved or come up with your own ideas this debate is not just to argue the merits of one idea come up with your own as well i for one do not buy into the idea that the current system is the best it can possibly be and if something is flawed you must strive to fix it

Edited by kilvehk, 26 September 2012 - 05:36 PM.


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#16 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 06:06 PM

im not saying my original idea was a good one it was barely thought out and not even half backed but impractical it was not flawed yes but not impractical think of ways these ideas could possibly be improved or come up with your own ideas this debate is not just to argue the merits of one idea come up with your own as well i for one do not buy into the idea that the current system is the best it can possibly be and if something is flawed you must strive to fix it

The problem is:

-You have no actual plan of your own. We've already pointed out the flaws of your plan in OP.

-My plan would be to stay with the current system of the Electoral College. You are yet to justify any arguments against this system

Edited by William, 26 September 2012 - 06:07 PM.

billiam.png


#17 kilvehk

kilvehk

    sheldon

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,164 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 07:13 PM

-My plan would be to stay with the current system of the Electoral College. You are yet to justify any arguments against this system


how about the fact that they can vote any way they choose regardless of how we vote that in and of itself negates the idea of a democracy they are given absolute power over our votes when they are not necessarily qualified to make such decisions perhaps you are right maybe the flaw isnt in the way we vote but rather the selection of the electoral collage perhaps the way in witch a person gains a seat on the electoral collage is what needs to be reformed


s5hjsj.png      kilvehk.png    2a7wy1z.png

thanks for the sig brandon!

 312z02g.png    vrvoli.png

2eojfhh.png24qlhmv.pngiqvn7s.png

 

2vlsea0.png

 

 

 

      

 

 


#18 Claudia

Claudia

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 556 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 07:40 PM

Well, we don't live in a pure democracy, we live in a representative democracy.

Democracy in its purest form would be impractical.

Sweetheart.png


#19 Paintball

Paintball

    Eppur si muove

  • Established Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,020 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 26 September 2012 - 08:27 PM

Does anyone know how the electoral college evolved?

What we currently do when we, for example, elect a new President is vote for them on the ballot. But, what we are actually voting for are the people to represent us in the electoral college. Candidates pick those people. Romney has his electoral college crew and Obama has the same. Some states are all are nothing, while others give out partial electoral votes. The number of electoral votes each state receives are based on the amount of representation in Congress (lowest amount you could have is 3).

We should just move into a direct voting method because technology now allows it. Right now, it is possible to win a plurality of the popular vote, but still lose the election.
Posted Image
Signature by Brandon

#20 William

William

    Outgoing Ogre

  • Established Members
  • PipPip
  • 139 posts
Click to view battle stats

Posted 27 September 2012 - 01:49 PM

Does anyone know how the electoral college evolved?

What we currently do when we, for example, elect a new President is vote for them on the ballot. But, what we are actually voting for are the people to represent us in the electoral college. Candidates pick those people. Romney has his electoral college crew and Obama has the same. Some states are all are nothing, while others give out partial electoral votes. The number of electoral votes each state receives are based on the amount of representation in Congress (lowest amount you could have is 3).

We should just move into a direct voting method because technology now allows it. Right now, it is possible to win a plurality of the popular vote, but still lose the election.


Vote counting is still a very messy process and direct popular voting results in much more expensive recounts on grander scales.

billiam.png